Zsófia Frazon

Chairs in the Museum: Character, Habit, Function. Beyond its aesthetic dimension, museum presentation—the act of placing artefacts in exhibition spaces to create interpretation—testifies first and foremost to how researchers and curators view culture, the museum, and the artefact as concepts. To display—to translate thoughts into spatial and visual language—is to render all of the above visible within the realm they occupy. In the end, many different qualities are achievable: hierarchic and glorifying; satiated with prima donna allure; dazzling and awe-inspiring; or, alternately, close and reserved; democratic; provocative of conversation and debate; or anything in-between. If the intent of organisers is to construct visual character, to render the exhibition dramaturgy readable by those who come to view it; and if visitors are at the same time curious enough—are open to connecting thought and spectacle to motion—then the narrative approach, where intellectual reception is enhanced through active, spatial thinking, will bring out the appropriate ‘reading’. The result is the creation of a dynamic exhibition in which creators, users, and artefacts all take part as operative players. At such an event, the dramaturgy, rhetoric, and roles created by museum staff set the stage for communal thought with museum users. The creators and curators of Chair Pairs made a conscious effort to set an exhibition stage that was active and changeable, while supplementing visual character and spatial arrangement with plasticity, and sight with touch and smell. Of course, this manifested differently with the museum pieces themselves than it did with the objects produced specifically for the exhibition or the elements of the surrounding installation. The result was an exhibition that was not only an installation, but also a workshop, platform, and forum—an experiment in the framework of genre and form. Its points of departure in creative thinking were 1) the act of sitting, 2) the furnishings that facilitate that, and 3) the way such objects are used and produced. The domain of ethnography as presented in museums focuses heavily on everyday life, including periods of both activity and passivity. In many cases, the activities involved are so completely evident as to be virtually invisible. So it is with sitting, an act that can be performed in myriad ways. We sit to rest, for a moment or hours; we sit to feel more comfortable; we sit to reach things better; we sit because it is less strenuous than squatting. We sit at table, at the window, at bedside, at circle, at the udder. Preferred heights vary from person to person: some like to sit close to the ground, others up high, where they can swing their feet. Anything goes, really. And for each such practice one finds a seating solution ready to serve, as Chair Pairs revealed to those who tread its floors with open eyes. In a museum, one explores the act of sitting by examining the furniture that enables it: form, function, material, technology, design, construction, colour scheme, and decoration in every variation. At the Museum of Ethnography, analytical work on the topic of the chair culminating in an exhibition is not without precedent. In 1999, when the institution had just published its catalogue for The Chair, an exhibition that had explored and analysed the Furniture and Lighting Collection’s various seating accommodations, it was at the same time opening its doors on Have a Seat!, an event that began as an exhibition of chairs, but expanded from there into the broader, more exciting domains of the symbolic relationship between object and society (nation, community, individual) and its translation into exhibition language. For me, the latter of these was the first exhibition I had encountered where I grasped the fascination scientific historical processes can hold not only for researchers, but for visitors, as well. The trick is to explain them in a way that is simultaneously analytical and c